Steve's profileContemplaydohPhotosBlogLists Tools Help

Blog


    May 31

    Guest post

    Just in case a real live human ever stops by again* looking for sarcasm and inanity posing as erudition, I can direct you to this.  It's a guest entry of mine at the Random Reviewer website on no less a topic than the future of all mankind.
     
    *as opposed to Yahoo, Google, or Baidu algorithms checking out Mary Kate Olsen's picture

    Comments (73)

    Please wait...
    Sorry, the comment you entered is too long. Please shorten it.
    You didn't enter anything. Please try again.
    Sorry, we can't add your comment right now. Please try again later.
    To add a comment, you need permission from your parent. Ask for permission
    Your parent has turned off comments.
    Sorry, we can't delete your comment right now. Please try again later.
    You've exceeded the maximum number of comments that can be left in one day. Please try again in 24 hours.
    Your account has had the ability to leave comments disabled because our systems indicate that you may be spamming other users. If you believe that your account has been disabled in error please contact Windows Live support.
    Complete the security check below to finish leaving your comment.
    The characters you type in the security check must match the characters in the picture or audio.

    To add a comment, sign in with your Windows Live ID (if you use Hotmail, Messenger, or Xbox LIVE, you have a Windows Live ID). Sign in


    Don't have a Windows Live ID? Sign up

    Stevewrote:
    That is early, R.S.  With you, it seems more likely that you just stayed up that late (as opposed to waking up that early).  You've always been a night owl, I know.  In any case, you've been pretty doggone prolific lately, and it's been good stuff, too.
     
    Your mom might find it easier to break the ice with a meme.  That way she doesn't have to think of a specific topic.  Another thought might be lists of favorite things (books, movies, music) with capsule reviews.   
     
    Susan and I just celebrated a milestone anniversary yesterday.  That's why I've been incommunicato for a while.  If I want to make it to the next one, it was important, it seemed, to plan something good for this one.
     
    Only 2 days till tourney time.  I'll be checking your new site for reviews.
    June 5
    Picture of Anonymous
    adam84 wrote:
    Spaces is getting ready to kick me off as well. I cancelled my account, so I don't know if this ID goes with it as well as the space or not. We'll see what happens in a couple of days.

    I've made a promise to myself to write more often, especially since cheesecake61 will be reading it as well. Yet, she still hasn't written anything. Any suggestions for her? I've told her to just sit down and type just to get something out, then go back and edit it if it needs it.

    R.S. -- early, early bird. "Farmer early."
    June 2
    Stevewrote:
    Kristi, you're part of a real trend, it seems, leaving msn spaces.  I know whenever I tried to visit your old site this week, it wouldn't let me in.  Now I know why.  The new place looks good -- and it features my favorite caption contest, I see.

    R.S., your new site looks great, too.  You've been so productive with your posts I can't keep up.  Funny how that works now that your spring semester is over.  I'll hope to catch up on all the Euro 2008 pre-tourney news this weekend.  Then maybe I can keep up with you a bit better. 
    May 30
    VENTL8Rwrote:
    Hi Steve!  Spaces kicked me off so I'm now at http://ventl8r@blogspot.com.  Stop by some time!
    May 30
    Picture of Anonymous
    thekid2409 wrote:
    Yes, I signed up for wordpress I can't seem to resist a new thing. I haven't learned everything yet which is probably why I didn't have a link to the blog from my comment. I forgot to put it in there or something, it's [http://onelife84.wordpress.com].

    I've been so caught up in the anticipation of the Euro 2008 Championships and the UEFA Champions' League Final, I've forgotten about the MLS. It seems as if Kansas City are still in the process of finding themselves in the first month of play. They got rocked at Los Angeles the other day 1-4. That's the most goals they've allowed in a long time. It looks like Chicago and Kansas City have reversed roles from last season, for the meantime.

    I think Spain has to come out of that underachieving slump they've been in. They have quality players, though I'm too sure of who is in their starting 11 may be as I am almost sure of Portugal's. But you have to figure that Fernando Torres will be there, Iniesta as well, Cesc Fabregas, David Villa, , and of course the man who is one of the best keepers in the world, Iker Casillas will be the starter. I'm totally clueless about who will play defense for Spain at the moment. I've been a little obsessive and hopeful about the squad Luis Felipe Scolari has and can't wait to see how well they'll play. My attention has been there, but... 10 days...

    R.S. aka adam84 @ wordpress
    May 27
    Stevewrote:
    Your sports acumen is as impressive as ever, R.S.  Thank you for the straight dope on Beasley.  I'd been leaning that way myself, but didn't realize until you cited the statistics just how dominant he was last year.  Rose, I'm sure, will be quite good, too, but he seems less polished.  I heard some commentary after the final that said he wasn't aggressive enough at the beginning of the game.  It may not be fair to judge him on just one performance, but if you do, the NCAA final is as good a test as any.
     
    Euro 2008 should be a great tournament.  I hope, too, that ESPN is rewarded for their complete coverage.  I haven't picked my favorites just yet, but will post here when I do.  You've heard me say before, though, that the Iberians are looking particularly good these days.  Could Spain actually break their pattern of underperformance in the big ones?  Are those young stars from Portugal ready to reign supreme?  Enquiring fans want to know.
     
    I was surprised to see Avram Grant get the axe, too.  Chelsea had a great thing going with Mourinho, as well, so they must just be trigger-happy.  The Ferguson news was not such a shock.  He'd been making noise about retirement even a few years ago.  Of course, that was before C. Ronaldo developed into the best footballer in the world.
     
    So do you now have a new blog, R.S.?  I saw your comment at Soccer Orb (from Adam84), but didn't see a link.  Hope your summer is going well, and that at least some of it can be devoted to sports, and blogs, and fun.
    May 27
    Picture of Anonymous
    thekid2409 wrote:
    About basketball, I think Chicago should use their #1 pick to take Beasley. Beasley is an impact player and was one for KSU, I don't follow the NBA, but Beasley should make some sort of noise. He set all sorts of Big XII records as a freshman [44 points in a single game (Big XII record), 28 double-doubles (most by freshman nationally), #3 (nationally) in average scoring, #1 (nationally) in rebounds per game, and in his debut game he had a conference record 24 rebounds]. I'm sure there are more. As soon as he hit the floor for the Wildcats, they won, and won against great teams (including KU). He also should have been player of the year but wasn't because Hansbrough was on a team that had a better record (my opinion). Beasley can do it all, but that is probably his weakness. Sometimes he has tried to do it all likely feeling that the team was relying on him, which can and has hurt the team. A couple of years in the NBA should mold him into a really great player, reluctant to use the word dominant. He's so big (6' 9" and 235 lbs) and he knows how to use his size against opponents, almost every team KSU played against had to double team him which left Walker open to score...he'll draw attention. Anyway, about Rose, Beasley does have the size factor on him, though I didn't pay too much attention to Rose (even during the tournament, or against KU) so I can't say much about him. I wish Beasley would not have gone to the NBA after his first season, because I wanted to see KU play him again and again. Imagine how scary-good he may have been in his senior season.

    On to football, Euro 2008 (btw 2 years left). On Friday's I play a little screw around game of indoor and two of the regulars' nationalities are Polish and German. They were commenting on the luck of the draw of their two nations, obviously in 2006 they were paired in the same group, and now in Euro 08' they are once again together in the same group. Also as I was told from one of them, this is Poland's first time qualifying for the Euros. News to me. Group A looks very strong from top to bottom.

    Time for foot-in-mouth predictions for group stages:
    Group A -- Portugal (biased) and Czech Republic
    Group B -- Germany and Croatia
    Group C -- France and Netherlands
    Group D -- Spain (biased) and Greece

    What do you think?? I'm so glad that ESPN360 is going to have so many games shown, and even ABC will get into the act for the latter stages of the tournament. Perhaps American interest is growing for the ABC network to show it on their airtime. Hopefully soon we'll get enough interest to have the MLS on ABC a frequent occurrence during the summer along with tennis (Wimbledon). Instead of baseball, golf, and NASCAR.

    What about Sir Alex's decision to step down as manager of Manchester Untied? That blew me away yesterday when I read it. Also, would you happen to know about Chelsea's manager issues? They ousted Avram Grant after he was supposedly on the hot seat after taking over for Jose Mourinho, who I still don't know why they got rid of him. I addressed this question to Susan to get her take on it as well. What is Chelsea looking for? I'm not understanding their logic, though it's probably just business.

    That wordpress that Susan uses looks pretty good, I might use it since blogger can be transferred to it.

    R.S. -- Early Bird...
    May 26
    Stevewrote:
    I had tried sedating myself with one more pint than the usual limit, but I was still kind of a basket case.  We saw it in an electrifying atmosphere, too.  Susan's most recent post describes it well.
     
    Ronaldo's goal was a thing of beauty.  I wish Tevez would have connected on his great chance, too.  Man U looked like the better side that first half, but then Chelsea played better in the second.  It's unfortunate that it had to go to penalties.  I'm sure most fans would prefer to see things decided on the field.  That said, and with the knowledge that my guys prevailed, it was a well-scripted ending.  Like you, I did feel bad for John Terry.  He almost seems more heroic, though, for having suffered the tragedy of the turf.  At least the circumstances of the miss mean that there were no real goats.  
     
    Thanks for the congratulations.  We will enjoy the victory, fortuitious though it may have been.  We've had enough shoot-outs go against us in the past to have earned the right. 
     
    The off-season always does produce added drama.  The big talk now is centered on Real Madrid's interest in Ronaldo.  It boggles the mind to imagine the price that would make that deal happen.  This off-season is spiced up by Euro 2008, too.  Both Portugal and Spain look very good to me.  The tourney may keep the Steve & R.S. Secret Sports Blog alive a while longer, too.  (If you're up for it.)
     
    Basketball doesn't register as much with me at the moment, but there is an interesting question people are mulling around these parts.  Should the Bulls use their #1 pick on Beasley or Rose.  I suppose you could make a strong case for either one.  You probably saw enough of KSU last year to have an informed view on the big guy.  Care to share it?
     
    Enjoy Western Civ, R.S.  That does sound better than a steady diet of equations.  And I majored in math.
    May 23
    Picture of Anonymous
    thekid2409 wrote:
    Well, well, well...I'll bet someone had a mild stroke yesterday after watching their team win in penalty kicks in the Champions' League Final. Cristiano Ronaldo got his goal early on and what placement! Cech had no chance. In the penalties, I thought sure as day John Terry would score his penalty and end it, but he missed. Ooof, I felt really bad him though, he was in a spot that kids dream of, and the surface gave out on him. I never would have expected Ronaldo to miss his penalty either. Anywho it was a fantastic match and Van der Sar came up with a magic save to win it. Congratulations!! Now I can rest a little bit easier knowing Barca was beaten by the best team in Europe. :-D

    Barca gets a new coach and despite what some may say, Rijkaard had 5 great seasons with Barca, Milan will not be in the Champions' League next season (that's just strange), Chelsea bought Porto defender Boswinga, what other changes and transfers will the summer hold for European football?

    Well, Summer classes will be without Calculus (somewhat of a bittersweet thing) JCCC wants me to have a college level Trigonometry class before I can take it there which I thought was strange. But, I will be "enjoying" a Summer class of Western Civilization I (the most popular class and somehow always closed class in the fall) to get that out the way. So, for the mean time no Implicit Differentiations, dy/dx or d/dx (trying to find dy/dx), Chain Rule, and no more 2x cubed = 6x squared through derivatives.

    I have also realized (today) that dogs can be great soccer companions. While practicing, in my 2nd or 3rd hour, a guy with his two dogs came running by, when out of nowhere one of them comes barking and bolted for the ball. The dog tried to put its mouth around it and once the dog felt that he had successfully "gotten" the ball he stood near the ball and waited for me. So I took it and started dribbling with it and the dog chased the ball trying to get it again. I guess after seeing how much fun it was the other dog joined in and it became 2 on 1. It was so much fun! So much so that one dog did not want to go back with the guy running! Those two dogs wore me out in the five minutes or so they played!

    R.S.
    May 22
    Stevewrote:
    Great hearing from you again, R.S.  I think the Red 7 is the perfect fashion statement for Wednesday's affair.  My most recent Man U jersey has Ruud van Nistelrooy's name on it.  It's slightly dated, but I'll be proud to wear it.  Susan tells me I even look a little  like Ruud, though I doubt he's got any gray on his head like what I'm beginning to find on my own.
     
    Speaking of Cardinal sins, I remember committing one, too, back when we were living in the KC area.  I could have supported the locals, the Royals, but chose the cross-state rivals in St. Louis instead.  (Sorry.  I'm pathologically drawn to puns, it seems, even though I know they're bad.)
     
    Summer calculus is bound to be both fun and edifying (he also says sarcastically).  So while the birds are singing, the breezes are blowing, and the ladies are in their summer attire, you'll be plodding through dy/dx of transcendental functions.  Hope it goes fast.  What's more, I hope the first and second derivatives with respect to time are both positive.
    May 19
    Picture of Anonymous
    thekid2409 wrote:
    Okay, finally, after stopping by several times and reading your comment telling myself, "I'm gonna get to a response, I'm gonna get to a response." all this week. The surprise in all of that is the fact that religion plays a part in who someone cheers for. I would have never imagined that Catholics in Scotland would choose Celtic to root for and Protestant's choose Rangers...

    (BTW highlights from the national media here of the UEFA Cup finals were not of the match but of the riots that ensued after Rangers lost, typical. Just like during the World Cup, when Poland lost in the fleeting moments to Germany, no media here showed the game-winning goal, they just showed Polish fans rioting). Continuing on the off-topic, I don't know about you, but the 2-0 result put in by Zenit St. Petersburg was a surprise to me. I thought Rangers would have secured the win for sure. I've never even heard of Zenit until the UEFA Cup this year.

    Back to topic...

    I wonder if hardcore Portuguese fans have the same idea about foreigners outside their league who cheer for Benfica, Porto, Sporting, or Nacional, seeing us as "inferior fans" who don't deserve to share in the glory and pain of a team? I was just curious about it because we all know here, location is a big determinant of who you cheer for especially in American football. It's almost a Cardinal sin to enjoy watching the K.C. Chiefs suffer and be open about it as I do and I am (go Broncos!). I thought the 4-12 season the Chiefs had last year was beautiful :-D

    Summer is going to be "fun" (he says sarcastically). I have to retake a calculus class I didn't do so well in, this Spring. All other classes were As and Bs and one C, then there was Calculus. For some reason, understanding numbers and concepts like in calculus and physics don't make sense to me. Yet at the same time, statistics makes almost perfect sense to me. So starting 2 June, I'll be in summer school re-learning calculus (yay). Then...it's one more year for me! One more and a semester if I want to continue doing research with the professor I'm going to do research with in the Fall! I cannot wait!

    I'll be tuning in definitely on the 21st and I'll be sporting Red 7.

    R.S.
    May 16
    Stevewrote:
    You ask a good question, R.S.  I'm not as much of an expert as a real Brit, but we did live in London for a while and I've got quite a few footy friends from England so I have noticed some of the patterns.  I would say that geography determines most of the support.  If you're from Manchester, you're in all likelihood either a United or a City fan.  In bigger cities, what part of town you're from can predict who you're more likely to support.  For instance, Eastenders in London are more apt to be for West Ham.  
     
    Family can play into the equation, too.  If several generations of the extended family all cast their lot with Liverpool, you may be predisposed towards them as well, even if they aren't the closest side.  Every once in a while you'll find someone who just enjoys being contrary.  If you live on the north side of London and all your friends are Gooners, you may claim allegiance to Chelsea, Spurs, or Man U just to be different. 
     
    In some places, religion can play a role.  Of course, in Glasgow it's almost certain that you're either for Celtic (Catholic) or for Rangers (Protestant).  Evidently, some of that has gone on in England, too, though not as much lately.  Man U had, at one time, a little more of a Catholic draw.  Spurs were who you supported if you were Jewish.
     
    There are also clubs that are so big, glamorous and successful that they draw fans from much wider areas.  In fact, I've heard references to cockney Reds -- Man U supporters who are from way outside of Manchester (like East London).  Some people dislike the fact that these Red Devil fans are "glory hunting" when they should be backing their local side. 
     
    A Man U fan site Susan used to visit had a thread on the way locals felt about the many non-local fans (especially the foreigners).  According to them, we're inferior.  We shouldn't get to share in the glory as equals.  All I know is that I don't care what elitist fans in Manchester think.  We'll enjoy the Premier League championship just fine from afar.
     
    Good luck with finals, R.S.  And please tune in wearing red on the 21st.
     
    May 12
    Picture of Anonymous
    thekid2409 wrote:
    Whoa, what a final week of regular classes before Finals week.

    I watched the Chelsea-Liverpool match and that Ryan Babel (Liverpool) has a cannon for a right foot. Petr Cech, I have no idea what he was thinking. It was a great shot, but it seemed like Cech was a little nonchalant about it. A rare mistake from an excellent keeper. Drogba, I've heard he was good, but now that I have this broadband connection I can actually watch him play without the constant "buffering" message, and he's pretty good and on that night was deadly accurate for Chelsea.

    I've always wondered how the love-hate relationships work in England. If Man U fans "hate" other teams like Man City, Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, and Tottenham just because they live in Manchester or because of past results against those clubs. In Portugal, people who live Porto, are not necessarily F.C. Porto fans (I could not imagine why not). There are many (about 1/4 or so) Porto residents who are, God forbid, Benfica fans or Sporting Lisbon fans. A resident of Porto came to my Portuguese class about a year ago and answered questions about life and culture in Portugal as opposed to Brazil. I of course asked him who his favorite team was, and to my shock and a little disappointment he replied, Benfica. Does that ever occur in England where there are Chelsea fans living in Liverpool or Liverpool fans living in Manchester, etc.? Does it occur in great numbers or are they the overwhelming minority?

    R.S.
    May 10
    Stevewrote:
    Thanks for stopping by again, R.S., after what must have been a tough loss to stomach.  You're right that it was an exceptional strike by Scholesy that did the job.  Having been in the same situation before, there's not much solace in knowing it was a good game.  The Chelsea-Liverpool match was a good one, too.  Did you see it?  Susan recorded it for me, but I haven't watched it yet.  Knowing the outcome beforehand makes it a less pressing matter.
     
    I can't think of a logical reason for hating Chelsea.  They have plenty of English stars to go along with their quality foreign players.  They play only a few miles from where we used to live in London.  While their huge budget makes them unappealing overdogs, a Man U fan can only take that argument so far.  I like blue, too.  Maybe once I cast my lot with United, hating Chelsea just seemed like the natural thing to do. 
     
    A Ronaldo goal sounds good to me, R.S.  Let's enlist his services for just that purpose.  I just hope he doesn't put on so much hair goop for the game that a would-be headed goal gets stuck against his skull.
    May 1
    Picture of Anonymous
    thekid2409 wrote:
    Well, congrats to Manchester United. Scholes had a fantastic shot off of Puyol's disaster of a clearance, there was absolutely nothing Victor Valdez could do. He was well out of position. I'm a little disappointed that Barca had all that possession and could do nothing with it. Messi and Deco were providing United with trouble and that's about it. It wasn't to be and it still hurts, I thought for sure Barca would have scored. Hopefully that'll make up for the loss to Chelsea over the weekend. I guess I'll continue to lick the wounds and watch the rest of Chelsea-Liverpool (been at school and work all day). I'll be rooting for United against whoever they play, I'll also be looking for a Ronaldo goal.

    R.S.
    Apr. 30
    Stevewrote:
    It's bound to be more open play tomorrow.  United know better than to even try for 0-0 in regulation.  Unfortunately, the goals haven't been coming as easily of late.  Plus, Vidich took a nasty knock in the jaw compliments of Didier Drogba.  He's the co-anchor of the Man U defense along with Rio, and would be sorely missed if he can't play.  You can't go into a big match thinking about all the excuses for failing, though, can you?
     
    The outcome at Stamford Bridge Saturday put me and Susan in a funk.  I have to say I'd hate to live in a world where Chelsea collects hardware and United doesn't.
    Apr. 28
    Picture of Anonymous
    thekid2309 wrote:
    Hmm... 0-0 at the Camp Nou. Playing conservatively. The winds of favor are tilted just ever so slightly in Barca's way. The least they could do is draw with goals which will put them through. Another goal-less draw would be much worse though. Playing in extra time away from the Camp Nou may likely work against Barca if it comes down to that. United plays very well at Old Trafford, and that's a little concerning. Let's just hope (for me at least) United doesn't have one of those matches similar to the 7-1 display against A.S. Roma a while back. I'm just happy Rooney, Tevez, and Ronaldo were held at bay, that's not easy to do.

    I saw the missed open net shot I think you're referring to. I'm not too sure if it was Barrett though. If that player would have kept with it, he may very well have scored. Instead, after his miss, he continued trotting past the end line and kicked some air out of frustration. The ball came back and fell right in the general area of where he would have likely been if he would have stayed on the field. I don't suspect that'll happen again. The KC defenders were in the right place at the right time to stop it on the line.

    More waiting, until we know who moves on...Barca knows what they have to do, and it's been proven a hard task to do this season.

    R.S.
    Apr. 25
    Stevewrote:
    On the eve of Barca - Man U, I'm doing all I can to concentrate on anything but the game.  I think it's to United's advantage that the first leg is at the Nou Camp.  They'll know exactly what they have to play for up in Manchester.  If the first leg is a draw, especially one with goals, then I'll like United's chances even more.  My concern is that Ronaldo has been marked out of games lately.  Rooney and Tevez are perfectly able to pick up some of the slack offensively, but it doesn't always work out that way.  We'll see how it all turns out.  Given Barca's poor run of form in La Liga, I'm sure there's concern among the faithful there as well.
     
    Portugal will be impressive in Euro 2008, I'm pretty sure.  What's interesting is how Figo and his generation have almost entirely given way to Ronaldo and his.  They've been developing tremendous talent for quite a few years now.
     
    Back in the MLS, I'm disappointed that the Fire couldn't get at least a point off the Wizards.  I missed the coverage, but heard that one of the Fire forwards, Chad Barrett, missed an absolute sitter -- an empty net at close range.  The Fire were lucky with some of their earlier results, though, so maybe it evens out.  KC is off to a good start in any case.
     
    Sorry our rooting interests are not aligned for tomorrow, but I doubt either one of us is all that sorry.
    Apr. 22
    Picture of Anonymous
    thekid2309 wrote:
    Ronaldo should be player of the year. I don't think I've seen a player on the score sheet in almost every game for his club. Especially for a team like Manchester United, and especially in a league like the EPL. He shouldn't be robbed of the World Footballer of the Year award. Who else is in contention who has been performing consistently like Cristiano?

    I don't think Portugal will underperform in the Euro 2008 tournament (I hope they wont). Though the Czech Republic could give them trouble, unless the Czechs played like they did in 06'. 2 players from Manchester United in Ronaldo and Nani will likely be on the squad, plus Ricardo Quaremsa. I know Quaresma is all right foot, but if keepers go to sleep on him, he'll make him pay with that wicked bend that he has. They have many of the old World Cup squad with a few exceptions. Though, I am surprised to not see Porto-forward, Helder Postiga in the current lineup. Hmm...

    As for the magician Ronaldinho, if or when he leaves, I'll miss him at Barca (regardless of the 'mooting' I've read that he's received from home fans), and the talent level of Milan will grow substantially. If Milan can reach the team chemistry of Manchester United, they'll be a huge force next season. Of course along with Barcelona, Manchester United, and Porto...I know the last team may have been stretching it, but they are very good. Sleeper team. :-)

    R.S.
    Apr. 19
    Stevewrote:
    Thanks for mentioning your nitefox update, R.S.  It'd been so long since your last one that I stopped making my daily stops.
     
    C. Ronaldo looks to be on pace for World Footballer of the Year.  Even if Portugal underperform in Euro 2008, his Man U glory should be enough to carry him to the award stand.  Just to be safe, though, he should lead United to Premiership and CL trophies.  That would cement the deal, I think.
     
    My Ronaldinho statement was just an educated guess.  I figured he'd want to stay where the weather is warm and the nights are lively.  Plus, Il Calcio has the money and prestige to warrant his attention -- almost as much as the Prem.
     
    April 23, indeed. 
    Apr. 16

    Trackbacks

    The trackback URL for this entry is:
    http://contemplaydoh.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!E66AD94BAC2BEEED!792.trak
    Weblogs that reference this entry
    • None